# Left Wing Theory

Synced from ~/Desktop/Politics

# An Analysis Of Far Right Tropes

## An Analysis of Far-Right Tropes

Part of the reason the far-right has managed to get such a large following in the UK is because they are like stuck records, repeating the same narratives and engaging in the same conspiracy theories over and over again. This repetition primes and programs the audience to accept more dangerous themes, or even triggers them into violence. These themes consistently emphasize exclusionary nationalism, anti-establishment sentiment, and the preservation of a perceived cultural and ethnic purity. The only way to combat these tropes is to understand them. Below, I have analyzed one of the most common tropes that the far-right use. Over the coming weeks, I hope to analyze others.

## Trope 1: “Protecting Our Women and Children”

On the surface, saying “we need to protect our women and children” sounds like a noble, heroic, and worthy cause. But in reality, it is an incredibly dangerous five-word trope. We’ve heard the phrase a thousand times, but let’s break it down word-by-word to understand how it actually works, and see if it stands up to critical scrutiny.

### 1. "Protecting"

Whenever a high-profile, violent crime happens—especially those involving women and children—the far-right immediately jumps on it. They twist and exaggerate the facts to suit their own narrative. They completely ignore the pain and wishes of the victim and their families, effectively hijacking the tragedy. Specifically, the far-right hyper-fixate on crimes perpetrated by minority groups, immigrants, or refugees. They blame and demonize entire communities for crimes perpetrated by individuals, implying that the entire group poses a massive risk to local families. They talk about these communities as if they are an invading force that society is ignoring. This is a classic example of the "boogeyman effect." This happens when a vague, exaggerated, or completely fabricated threat is used to scare the public, manipulate behavior, and force people to take sides. By whipping up panic about a monster at the gates, the far-right can falsely claim to be the "protecting" force that will save you. But as the facts show, it is a total con. These men are not a protective force—and anyone who points this out is instantly accused of being part of the problem rather than the solution.

### 2. "Our"

The second someone says “our” women and children, they automatically create a “their” group. This language strips women and children of their humanity. They stop being real people with individual lives and instead become territory that a bunch of men claim to own and defend from the boogeyman. To defend this imaginary territory, the playbook relies entirely upon the outdated “stranger danger” myth—the movie idea that the threat is always an outsider hiding in a bush ready to pounce, or a monster creeping through a bedroom window at night. But decades worth of crime statistics prove unequivocally that women and children are overwhelmingly more at risk from people they actually know: partners, relatives, and family friends. It is all about who has access. While adults have large social circles, a child's universe is tiny, involving only family and trusted adults. Tragically, this means abusers are usually already inside that trusted circle. Statistically, the younger the victim, the closer the family link to the abuser becomes. (Possible break point to discuss statistics on domestic and familial abuse) By hiding this reality, the trope creates a dangerous two-tier victim system. Crimes committed by outsiders are amplified to cause panic, while the massive amount of violence perpetrated by people within the dominant community is completely ignored. We saw a shocking, real-world example of this recently. During a far-right demonstration pushing this exact ideology, a woman took the microphone to share her experience as a survivor of a gang rape. However, the moment the organizers and the crowd realized the perpetrators were white, the microphone was snatched away. A man grabbed her, pulling her off the makeshift stage, while the crowd heckled her with misogynistic slurs. (Possible point to show footage on screen) This brave woman's story matters because it represents the actual reality of sexual violence in the UK, but it also exposes the intense cognitive dissonance and total apathy of the far-right. This woman went through a harrowing, life-altering event and showed immense courage by speaking out. Because the far-right believe that perpetrators can only come from minority, immigrant, or refugee groups, facing evidence that shattered this belief caused them deep psychological discomfort. To avoid that discomfort, they threw away normal social decency and ignored her physical boundaries. Without her permission, men—who claim to be "protecting" women—put their hands on a survivor and dragged her away. The reality is simple: if you want to touch a woman, you ask. If you want to claim you protect women, you respect the physical boundaries that abusers ignore. Furthermore, when women are treated like territory instead of human beings, the far-right treats violence like a border war. Because a sexual or violent crime can never be undone, they don't look for actual justice—they look for revenge. They launch "counter-attacks" against the minority group they've blamed. Tragically, this means the women and children in that community are now placed at extreme risk. This is why statistics show that whenever this trope goes viral, racially motivated hate crimes skyrocket. (Possible break point to discuss examples of retaliatory hate crimes)

### 3. "Women and Children"

Finally, when the far-right claims to be protecting "our women and children," they are doing two deeply damaging things. First, by suggesting men are the sole protectors of women and children, the far-right enforces rigid, harmful gender stereotypes. It forces a black-and-white view of the world: the passive "nurturing" female versus the aggressive "protector" male. The problem with this outdated stereotype is that nurturing is protection, and protecting is nurturing. Men and women routinely switch these roles or share them naturally. When we allow this type of gender stereotyping to pass without question, we turn normal human behavior into something treated with suspicion. It creates a broken culture where a father spending time alone with his child in a park faces panic, or a woman aggressively defending her family is labeled as unhinged. Secondly, by intentionally leaving adult men out of the equation, the far-right completely ignores the fact that men and boys are also the victims of serious violent and sexual crimes. By refusing to acknowledge them, they dismiss the pain of male victims, stripping them of their experiences and erasing their need for support. According to the Crown Prosecution Service, roughly 12,000 men are raped or sexually assaulted in the UK annually—averaging 32 men every single day—with 98% of the perpetrators identified as male. This attitude of dismissing and erasing certain victims is exactly what makes it so hard for them to come forward. It creates a hostile environment that fosters shame, silence, and blame.

## Why This Matters: The Reality of "Moral Masquerading"

(This section shifts to the final thought / why this matters) The far-right works incredibly hard to keep society in a state of fight-or-flight—to keep us looking for fictional boogeymen in the bushes rather than looking at actual crime data. When we look at the statistics of the movement itself, they paint a devastating picture. During and after the Southport Riots, the police arrested a large number of people involved in the public disorder. The Guardian revealed a staggering statistic: of those arrested, 41% had a history of domestic abuse reports. More recently, follow-up data revealed that since the Southport riots, 60% of those individuals with previous domestic abuse reports went on to commit similar offenses. This exposes the ultimate hypocrisy of the entire movement. It is a textbook case of "Moral Masquerading"—a psychological tactic where individuals aggressively perform public righteousness to mask their own private offenses. They use a wall of xenophobic moral grandstanding to hide a history of domestic perpetration. When we look past the online profiles and the flags, the real-world actions of the movement’s prominent figures tell the true story:

- Ryan Bridges (Raise the Colours): Marching under the banner of "protecting women," Bridges was recently recorded posting flags. When a female counter-protester staged a peaceful protest by sliding underneath his parked vehicle to stop him from erecting more flags, Bridges climbed under the van, touched her face and shoulders, and tried to forcibly remove her coat and bag. Just days later, he was caught on camera open-palm striking a female counter-protester in the face during a rally.

- Ryan Ferguson: Heavily linked to the campaign, Ferguson loudly claims to be "protecting women and children." Yet, he actively visited convicted far-right sex offender Jack Renshaw in prison. While Ferguson publicly claimed he cut ties after the visit, leaked phone recordings revealed him speaking to Renshaw in prison, bragging about how well their political campaign was going.

- DP Audits: Claims to protect women and children, but was recently exposed for sending explicit rape threats via digital communications to an innocent man after mistakenly identifying him as a political counter-protester.

- Bare Britain Audits: Became the subject of a court-issued Non-Molestation Order after targeting his ex-partner with malicious communications.

- Billy Allison: A regular fixture in these circles, recently arrested and charged with murder following a violent altercation that left a man dead.

## Conclusion

When these men repeat the "protect our women and children" trope over and over, they are trying to build an alibi in plain sight. They want to convince the public that someone who speaks so passionately about protecting families could never harm one. They trick us into believing outdated stereotypes, they manipulate us into ignoring male victims, and they hide the real, systemic dangers that happen behind closed doors. We become complicit only when we remain ignorant of the facts. When we look at the data, lift the mask, and take responsibility for the truth, we raise our standards—and we allow the voices of survivors and real champions to completely drown out their lies.

# Cost Of Words

## More than Words

Before I begin, if you or anyone you know has been affected by domestic abuse please call the National Domestic Abuse Helpline, free of charge 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. Abusers do not take the day off, so neither do the support organisations that are there for you. You are not alone. Remember at home should not mean at risk.

## Why I wrote this

It has been brought to my attention that BBA (Bare Britain Audits) has requested a female perspective regarding the posts he made about his ex-partner and mother of his child. He asked this on his live stream in the aftermath of the ACOB and Byline Times exposés. The community BBA is attached to is deeply misogynistic and entrenched in far-right ideologies. The vast majority of respondents whether male or female would therefore likely be supportive of his justifications and will rescue him from any accountability. I will give the short answer, directed at BBA himself, and a long answer, one that hopefully proves there is an incredibly high number of perpetrators hiding in plain sight within the so-called ‘auditing community’. I will not mince my words or dumb down for the Tube-lights that are a bit dim and take a while to switch on. I am not demure, passive or timid. I am a survivor. I will stand up with, and for my sisters.

## Statistics Relating to Domestic Abuse

- On average in the UK a woman is killed by a man every 3 days. [1]

- Globally a woman is murdered every 10 minutes by her partner.

- The most dangerous time for a woman (not just those experiencing domestic abuse) is the moment she chooses to leave the relationship. [2]

- In the UK around 31% of all women have or will experience domestic abuse. That's almost a third of all women. [3]

- The rate of Suspected Victim Suicide after Domestic Abuse (SVSDA) continue to increase. In the UK SVSDA are suspected to be much higher than intimate partner homicides (Hoeger, K. et al., 2025) Its is estimated that every day almost 30 women attempt suicide as a result of experiencing domestic abuse and three women a week take their own lives. [3]

- “A new study suggests receiving threatening or obscene messaging in the form of repeated digital or mail communications is common in the context of intimate partner violence, with victims at higher risk of mental disorder, self-harm and suicidality within the following year.” City St. Georges University, London [4]

## The Ladder of Escalation-Pyramid of Harm

The Pyramid of Harm is a visual aid which demonstrates the escalation ladder of interpartner violence and gender-based violence towards females. It’s a tool which allows professionals to spot lethality markers and predict crimes like rape and homicide. It is very similar to the Pyramid of Hate which predicts Genocide. As with any escalation ladder, the more socially acceptable behaviours are towards the bottom, the further up we climb the more dangerous and unlawful the behaviours become. We have an epidemic of gender-based and racially motivated gender-based violence in the UK. The statistics are clear, the vast majority of perpetrators are British born white males.Despite this fact men linked to the far-right insist they are “protecting our women and girls” by hyper fixating on a small number of offenders based on their asylum status and/or ethnic background. When they do this they draw attention away from the vast majority of offenders and ignore their victims. It has a secondary effect. It turns women and girls into territory. When the far-right hyper fixate on a specific perpetrator type (asylum seekers), and suggest they are attacking “our women and children” (British white women and children) they create an ‘us’ vs ‘them’ environment. The vast majority of offenders (white British males) are ignored, and so too are their victims. And it greenlights racially motivated sexual violence against non-white women and children, by males filled with hate and wanting to even the score. Throughout history women have become the “spoils of war”, two tribes go to war, the winners get to rape and pillage as reward. Enough is enough, we are not territory, we are people. Misogyny and far-right ideologies go together like a hand in a glove. We saw this after the Southport Riots. 41% of the rioters the police made contact with, were already known to the police having had previous contact for domestic abuse related incidents. It is unknown exactly how many auditors have had previous contact with the police for similar offences, but auditors being outed for these types of crimes and worse is a far too common occurrence.

## The Short Answer

In a public post about 10 years ago, BBA expressed a strong desire to “drive off a bridge/cliff” with his ex (the mother of his child) in the car, this was a threat of murder suicide. Statistics prove that murder suicide is an act predominately committed by males between the ages of 25-34. How old was BBA when he made this threat? In the UK their have been several high profile cases of murder suicide. Worryingly, a high number of these crimes involve children, the crime is known as 'familial annihilation'. While BBA may wish to downplay the seriousness of this specific post. He should understand that what he said, at the age that he said it, to a female victim, and with a young child involved, increased the risk factor because these are all 'Lethality Markers'. In addition to sending messages threatening Murder Suicide, he also posted messages which wished she would die by “falling under a bus” and he wished her injury through “boiling water”. Disfigurement and the threat of disfigurement is a form of coercive control, it's how perpetrators control victims. When men are the victims of disfigurement the cause is almost always linked to robbery or gang related violence. When women are the victims? The motive is almost exclusively 'possession'. The perpetrator destroys the woman's face and her perceived value and beauty. This is a punishment for leaving and in the perpetrators mind, a way to control her future love life. While BBA did not carry out these acts, he threatened them, which means he perceived the victim as a “possession” not a person at the time of these threats. She was territory, and if he could not have her, nobody would. The type of texts that were published, to the public, and by BBA himself, at the time of the harassment of his ex, are widely recognised forms of domestic abuse. The fact that he is now asking for public opinion on why his domestic abuse was not bad, is utterly preposterous. It shows that he has yet to acknowledge the severity of his crimes or the impact on his victim. Even more concerning, he is asking an audience with many members who support his far-right and misogynistic beliefs, values and ideologies and so he is likely to be validated. Which of course re-victimises the victim. Domestic abuse is an escalating crime, it starts with “little things” that have a massive effect. Put downs, guilt trips, jealousy baiting, ostracisation and isolation. And it escalates in far too many cases to physical violence, rape and murder. I put “little things” in quotes because what others perceive as little things to the victim are massive, and take years to overcome, long after any physical scars have healed. It's the programming phase, where through small acts of control or manipulation the victim is trained by the perpetrator to behave in a certain way. Sometimes it's overt “that tops too revealing”, other times it's covert 'like remaking cups of tea over and over because it “wasn't done right”' both actions train the victim through repetition and undermining his/her confidence. The texts were sent 9-10 years ago, BBA reckons he should be able to escape his past. I'll tell you why he can't escape his past in two words... ‘Clare's Law’. which protects future victims from repeat offenders: A 36 year old mother Clare wood made multiple reports to the police of harassment, threats and sexual assault from her ex-partner George Appleton. At no stage was she told of his violent history, and his violent history was not assessed as posing an additional risk factor. After Appleton murdered Clare, her father ran a campaign arguing that had she known of his violent past, she would have survived. Clare's Law exists because almost 80% (4 out of 5) domestic homicides were committed by perpetrators that were known to the police before the homicide took place. 60% (3 out of 5) were known to the police for previous domestic abuse related incidents. The Clare’s Law disclosure scheme has, and continues to save lives. The reason BBA does not get to escape his past is because the statistics support a lifetime of safeguarding and disclosure to protect future partners from similar abuse. His texts, which he downplays, are actually known as 'Lethality Markers' to professionals. Maybe the following questions will give him some perspective:

1. Is BBA's child now old enough to read and understand the texts he sent to their mother?

2. Would it be domestic abuse if in the future his child's partner nominated them for the “boiling water challenge”? hoped they “fell under a bus”? And threatened to “drive off a bridge/cliff” with his child in the car?

3. Would he want his child's partner to be able to escape their past? There has been no contrition, BBA thinks he can simply say it happened ten years ago and move on. This means after ten years he still does not value her as a human, he still believes she deserved the behaviour and is only upset that he got caught and then later outed. Today, BBA claims to be a “patriot”, who is trying to “protect our women and children”. He and the men he surrounds himself with have problematic backgrounds, or are currently displaying behaviours that are reminiscent of those perpetrated by domestic abusers, all outlined in answer two. BBA himself engages in these behaviours currently with these men. So why should a man who displayed multiple lethality markers and who is still displaying those behaviours be allowed to escape his past, and why should we the audience rescue him?

## The Long Answer

You can learn a lot about a person from the words they use. Linguistic Empathy [5] is the ability to recognise emotional cues and cultural nuances in words. Positive language signals respect, when we use negative terms, we expose our disgust. The bullying of ACOB (A Couple of Burkes, a small channel with just over 700 subscribers) has gone on for about a year and began on the Society X panel when Lewis (ACOB Jr) and Mr Burke (ACOB Sr) rejected the term “savages” being used as a pejorative by a panellist to describe people from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. ACOB correctly pointed out that the word was “steeped in racial and colonial history”. The panellist conflated the definition of the word savage with a more acceptable form and refused to accept his usage had been racist. People with high EQ are extremely good at picking up on nuances in our words, they can feel the emotion that is driving them, if that emotion is ‘superiority’ and ‘hate’ they respond by rejecting it. Which is exactly what Lewis and Mr Burke did in regard to the term “savage” rejecting both the use and the conflation. Linguistic Empathy is not just a skill, it's a superpower.

## Rhys

Rhys, (owner of the channel Average Idiot) and BBA retaliated by calling Mr. Burke a “cuck”, a term designed to strip a man of his dignity by suggesting he is a passive observer in his own life and most private intimate moments. This was extremely cruel, knowing Mr. Burke is a widower. In psychology, insults are verbal leakage, they mirror the perpetrators own insecurities. Rhys very recently admitted to visiting a swingers club with his father and step mother. This was an admission of a boundary-blurring family dynamic that would make most people's Yuck-o-meter explode. This admission was on a Society X show, he seemed as shocked as anyone at the disclosure. But Rhys and DP (who was also on the panel) failed to recognise the moral repugnance of the story. In fact DP expressed disappointment in Rhys for not participating in activities at the swingers club, when he said “nah, I'd have been bare deep in clunge mate.”. Neither Rhys nor DP understood how deeply troubling and socially unacceptable this story was. When men like Rhys and DP share stories like this, or use language like “savage” to describe peoples from other backgrounds and cultures, or use words like “clunge” to describe female genitalia, they are displaying extremely low linguistic empathy at stage 1 and 2 of the pyramid of harm. And, by calling a grieving widower a “cuck”, these men are projecting their own sordid fascinations onto a man who simply wanted them to use a less offensive word.

## BBA

Another example of low linguistic empathy was when BBA’s search history exposed the term “nugget” for amputee-fetish porn, he didn't apologise for the dehumanisation. Instead, he deployed tactical DARVO [6]. DARVO stands for Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim Offender. It's a manipulative tactic used by abusers to avoid accountability when they are challenged on their behaviour. The perpetrator denies the behaviour, attacks the person confronting them, then claims to be the true victim. The Tactical DARVO BBA deployed:

1. Deny: "It’s just a kink."

2. Attack: "ACOB are bullies for exposing me."

3. Reverse Victim and Offender: "I am being kink-shamed!" This "kink-shaming" defence is a lie. Real kinks involve respect for the participants. Using a derogatory term proves the motive was ridicule and dominance, not desire. A close associate of his, DP Audits (mentioned in the next section), admitted that he had watched this material in a discord VC group for "banter," proving that for them, marginalized bodies are just props for a laugh. That's not OK, that's step two of the 'Pyramid of hate' -Acts of Bias. BBA’s Discord server was recently infiltrated by a reporter from Byline Times, who exposed many dangerous practices. The server contains a channel marked XXX-Rated where women are routinely objectified. The following appears to be a screenshot posted by BBA to that channel: This type of objectification and low linguistic empathy is not OK. It strips women of their identity, reducing them to objects for the amusement of men. While discord is interpreted as a private space, it is actually a public space which BBA shares with a reported 175 members. It was also reported that members pay £4.99, but it was unclear if this was related to YouTube memberships or discord memberships or whether this payment was a one off. On Youtube memberships are monthly and he has over 130k subscribers. If that is on YouTube he is earning approximately £870 a month for memberships alone. If the memberships are on Discord then they are likely a one-off payment. While claiming to be a “patriot” Byline Time also exposed BBA for sharing a picture of Hitler and Mussolini with the caption “the good guys”. These were not the good guys, they were fascistic dictators, and many Allies died so that we would not have to live under their repressive regimes. BBA is now desperately spinning more plates than a circus juggler. He is trying to convince his audience that ACOB, specifically Lewis, holds a grudge. BBA is claiming that Lewis falsely accused him of having material in his Discord relating to automatic rifles, in reality, Lewis exposed the abusive texts (that had already been exposed previously), and then days later Byline Times published their article, which ACOB read out on stream. Any claims about guns were made by Byline Times. Below is a link to the video where BBA blames Lewis (aka JohJ): 2026-04-25 05-54-49 BBA false claim.mp4 In the same stream BBA and his companion discussed their opinions about women and equality and the “true statistics” about domestic abuse”. The statements made are horrific including a claim that “women are more abusive than men” a demonstrably false claim as the statistics show. He then made the claim that “domestic violence in lesbien relationships is rife”. According to statistics approximately 25% of lesbians and 40% of gay men experience domestic abuse which means there is a higher prevalence of domestic abuse in male-same-sex relationships. To hear BBA’s opinions on women and perceived levels of DV in lesbien relationships click the link below (content warning for the topics discussed): 2026-04-25 05-41-53 BBA/Nathan opinions.mp4 The fact is domestic abuse is overwhelmingly a crime perpetrated by men against women. According to ONS statistics [7] and Women’s Aid [3]: Coercive Control: Men make up 97% of defendants in prosecutions for coercive and controlling behaviour where the sex of the perpetrator is known. Homicides: In the majority of female domestic homicides recorded between 2022 and 2024, the suspect was a male partner or ex-partner. Police Records: Women were the victims in 72.1% of all domestic abuse-related crimes recorded by the police in the year ending March 2025, rising to 90.9% for domestic sexual offences. Repeat Victimisation: Approximately 83% of high-frequency victims (those experiencing 10 or more crimes) are women, highlighting that serious perpetration is most often a sustained male pattern of abuse. On two separate occasions, BBA has run live streams where he has offered money to whichever audience member produces Lewis’s address first. This is brigading, where an audience is triggered into a coordinated attack, and it’s against YouTubes TOS. It's also setting a bounty which is criminal solicitation, conspiracy and harassment. He has suggested that when he gets the address he intends to “doorstep” Lewis. In this community, that’s code, it signals the intention to turn up at the home, without invitation, and assault the victim of the doorstepping. In regard to the post made about his ex, BBA claims to be a changed man who has calmed down a lot in nearly 10 years, and should be able to escape his past. On YouTube, where he is known to be volatile and aggressive, and where he has engaged in threatening behaviour and imposing bounties, BBA claims to be a changed man, but if that was the case why did he post the following two days ago? Another extremely concerning fact is that many of BBA’s YouTube associates (mentioned below) and friends (Rhys-see above, and Nathan from the clips), have displayed similarly worrying behaviours. And a large number of self-described auditors have been outed as having committed serious offences against women and children. The algorithm brings like minded people together. Even if they are racist and misogynistic minds (Stage 1 of the Pyramid of harm), all the way up to sex offending, domestic abuse perpetrators (Stage 4 & 5 of the Pyramid of Harm).

## DP Audits

When Lewis exposed BBA for using the term “nugget” to search for amputee-fetish porn, DP (DP Audits/Paul Dunbar) was the one who exposed the group for watching the material. In his mind he would rather the group be seen as objectifying disabled women, rather than BBA be seen as an individual that derives pleasure from that type of material. He acknowledged the motivation behind watching it was to laugh, then bizarrely claimed ACOB was kink-shaming. You can not kink shame a person who does not have a kink. Lewis’s superpower; ‘linguistic empathy’ was switched on, he recognised that a person with a genuine kink, would use respectful language, not derogatory terms. Lewis suspected the real motivation was objectification and DP exposed that. When the facade of DP’s excuse began to crumble. DP resorted to spreading malicious rumours and creating AI deepfakes of Jasmine, Lewis's late fiancée. Jasmine had dwarfism, but in her life, she was more accomplished and more loved than these "auditors" will ever be. DP likened Jasmine to a child due to her stature and accused Lewis of unnatural proclivities.DP weaponised the physical appearance of a deceased woman to silence her grieving partner. This is "Low EQ" at its most dangerous. Through Google reporting systems ACOB managed to get the deepfakes removed but not before thousands of people had seen them. Months later ACOB was presenting a new stream about the auditing community, as part of that production there was a small section covering DP’s auditing practices, specifically the frequency with which he commits aggravated trespass, into accommodation housing asylum seekers. Midway through the production DP put a malicious copyright claim against ACOB. not only was the live taken down but ACOB was placed on a temporary ban from uploading. DP ran around YT panels proudly announcing how he had taken the ACOB channel down. Said it would “teach them a lesson”. This was a little inconvenient for ACOB, but they followed the processes and countered the copyright claim…and they won. Sometimes when you win against a Copyright strike, Youtube gives the striker (DP) 14 days to prove they had an intention to take the struck channel (ACOB) to court and if this proof is not shown that channel can be banned from using reporting tools or even banned from the platform altogether. We are still inside that window yet DP is reluctant to speak about it. The next few days will tell us what Youtube's intentions are, or if there will be no punishment for DP. Immediately after ACOB won they went live to finish the live stream DP was trying to suppress. DP resorted to calling ACOB a bully. DP has around 45k subscribers, ACOB has about 700, it’s like Goliath claiming David was a bully which is risible. There were people in ACOB’s audience who appeared to have been sent by DP to disrupt. ACOB ploughed through and got the information out. DP and two far-right figures (Ryan Ferguson and Jackson Media), trespassed into a hotel which they suspected house asylum seekers, who were referred to as “illegals”. The three, barged past security and other staff and managed to get into the private room of a guest. They subjected the guest to offensive questions, before being removed from the premises. DP’s two accomplices were later caught by the police and charged with aggravated trespass. They had a plea hearing at court. Instead of appearing in the dock with his codefendants, DP attended as a self-described citizen journalist, reporting on events. DP and Ryan have repeated this hotel invasion at multiple different locations including getting into a fight outside one prior to, and after the charges were imposed. INSIDE A MASSIVE MIGRANT HOTEL IN LIVERPOOL CITY CENTRE. POLICE ARRIVE. IN COURT OVER OUR LIVERPOOL MIGRANT HOTEL VIDEO.. AGGRAVATED TRESPASS… DP has also taken to exposing “paedophiles”, these predator-hunt videos are quite popular on YouTube and the sting itself is carried out by teams that have spent time ensuring they have strong evidence against the target and that they keep the target safe during the sting. At least one of the stings conducted by DP was botched, the perpetrator became the victim when it was shown that he had done absolutely nothing wrong. DP had acted on hearsay, turned up at the man's home where he resided with family and tried to instigate a riot. At another sting local adults and children were riled up by DP and his accomplices, who broke the man's windows. A local woman came out to explain that the man had “learning difficulties…and is a vulnerable adult”, her pleas were ignored and she was called a “paedo protector” by a very angry mob. The situation got so bad police had to swoop in and remove the man from his own property for his safety. NOTE: Blake/Seymour/Thorp vs Fox 2024. In a Twitter exchange Lawrence Fox called for people to boycott Sainsbury’s over their positive promotion of black history month. The claimants Simon Blake, Colin Seymour (also known as Crystal) and Nicola Thorpe accused Fox of being racist, Fox responded by calling each of the claimants “paedophiles”. The court found in favour of the claimants Blake and Seymour, dismissing Thorp’s claim as her language had been equally libellous as Fox’s. Fox was initially ordered to pay Blake and Seymour £90,000 each but on appeal this was reduced to £45,000 each. The counter claim by Fox, arguing he had been called a racist, was dismissed because that term did not cause serious harm, being called racist is a matter of opinion. Falsely calling someone a paedophile can lead others to rise up and impose their own vigilante justice because calling someone a paedophile is perceived as a matter of fact. This act is dangerous and libelous as proven by this case. The far-right idolizes Lawrence Fox, who has shared platforms with figures like Tommy Robinson. DP should be aware of Mr. Fox and so should be aware of this case. The fact is you can call someone a racist, people are entitled to an opinion. You cannot call somebody a paedophile, unless you have exceptionally strong evidence to back up that claim, otherwise you open yourself up to a massive claim. These videos of DP’s behaviour show that he is an extremely dangerous individual with no regard for the protection of women and children. His practices are predatory, calculated and extremely aggressive, so much so that he has instigated small-scale riots. As for ACOB? All they are doing is showing that these men document their own wrongdoing and make sure they are accountable for it.

## Mr Inbetween

At some stage Ray (aka Mr Inbetween) interjected himself into the situation, in defence of BBA and DP. He announced himself the hero that intended to save the auditing community from ACOB. In psychological (non-diagnosable) terms, this is known as the 'Saviour Complex',driven by a desire for validation or control (not altruism), it's a compulsive need to either save or fix others, often to their own detriment. Ray confidently boasted that he would “debate little Lewis, anytime, any place”, so Lewis invited him onto his platform for a debate. Ray lost the debate...miserably. Despite this, he went back to his own platform and announced himself the winner. When he did not receive the validation and adoration he expected, and when he failed to save the auditors as promised, he demanded a second debate, on his own platform, with strict rules. These rules limited Lewis's ability to cite sources for his arguments, which Ray capitalised on by using a slew of rhetorical fallacies and repeatedly gaslighting. For many it was clear that Lewis had won, in-spite of bad faith tactics. For the last 6 months Ray has put out between 2 and 8 posts a day, almost everyday, either directly targeting Lewis and Mr. Burke or indirectly targeting them by attacking “Lefties”. These posts are filled with ad hominem and ad personam attacks. Ray also engaged in the “cuck” narrative putting his own sordid twist on it, claiming Lewis was forced to watch his mum and dad having intimate relations and that, that is what “broke” him. The ACOB show is made up of multiple segments. One segment exposes the far-right auditors. This means that ACOB’s team watches a lot of content produced by these influencers. Ray has tried to spin a narrative that Lewis is stalking these channels when it is clear from the sheer number of posts Ray has put out about Lewis that he is the cyber-stalker. Here are a few examples: In a live stream Ray claimed there was “no such thing as human rights” the ACOB team took a screenshot of this comment to make a post about how the far-right were pushing a narrative that Human Rights are restrictive rather than liberating. When Ray found out he missed the point altogether and attacked ACOB calling them an “Anti-British Bigot” Link to post. In another post Ray accuses Lewis of fraud. Ray snooped around and managed to get access to Lewis’s Facebook page where he discovered Lewis sold a few t-shirts, since this was not meant to be a business and he did not have a Paypal at the time, Lewis suggested direct bank transfers as a payment option. Lewis then decided he could make a small amount of revenue through selling t-shirts and so he advertised. Unfortunately he did not change the payment method. Ray latched onto this and for weeks has been responding to serious wrongdoing that ACOB exposes by accusing him of fraud. Link to post. The particular post I have chose as an example shows Ray downplaying evidence that DP sent a threat to rape a counter-protesters wife and daughters, while up-playing the accusation of fraud. This is low EQ and it’s dangerous. Mr Burke is a widower, Lewis is his son. Ray repeatedly makes posts accusing Mr And Mrs Burke of “dragging Lewis up”, this is done in the full knowledge that Mrs Burke has passed away and ACOB is a family still grieving their losses. Lewis did a post which exposed Ray for this behaviour. Ray responded by taking a screenshot and creating a post accusing ACOB of being “desperate for attention…spreading hate and lies…and skint” he then threatened to do a live show that night for a “deep dive” into Lewis. It is clear that Ray is obsessed due to his lack of rational and logical thinking skills. ACOB takes a screenshot of an abusive post from Ray as evidence, they post it to an audience of 700 people. Ray screenshots that exact evidence and re-posts it to his own page and audience of 20k subscribers and he doubles down by adding more harassment and statements proving his cyber-stalking. Link to post. The type of tactics Ray deploys against ACOB are the very same behaviors used by other types of abusers. There is the relentless barrage of posts about ACOB, and cyber-stalking of Lewis, the weaponisation of grief, the derogatory language, the threats of investigations/surveillance. The most worrying aspect is Ray is very closely linked to DP and BBA who are displaying similar problematic behaviour and at least in BBA’s case have problematic pasts all rooted in misogyny. If it was to transpire, Ray had similar misogynistic views about women I would be extremely worried indeed. Ray is deeply Misogynistic proven by the comments he has made on panels and the posts he has uploaded. In a recent post he claimed “lefties don’t like British culture”, and he claimed “lefties” don’t have a sense of humor because “they don’t work”. Ray then claimed that British culture is on the “walls of workplace [sic] toilet cubicle[s]” he attached three screenshots which he claimed were “poetry”. In the first screen shot it looks like the term “You SL*g” was edited into the picture using photoshop. The ‘G’ in ‘thing’ and ‘minge’ in screenshot two and in ‘pulling’ on screenshot three are identical. Whether Ray took a crayon to work and had a conversation on the toilet wall with himself, or pulled the images off the internet is irrelevant, the sentiment is what matters. The terms “slag” and “minge” are extremely derogatory gender-base insults. In another post Ray suggested that he would have "given his seat up for any of these women…but not now!!” he went on to say “it's the floor for you ladies”. He calls this “equality”. The screenshot that accompanies the post shows a busy train with some passengers sitting on the floor, and others standing. The lack of linguistic empathy is astounding. Throughout English history women were legally and socially positioned beneath men. We were forced to sit on lower seating at church services, restricted from entering public places. We were treated like an extension of our husbands and fathers, not a human, a limb. This legal existence was called “Coverture”. The imagery and terms used mirror the practice of coverture, not equality. Another concerning matter of note relating to Ray is his ‘Rate the Police’ website. Starting around a year ago, Ray set up a crowd-funding operation. He was looking for financial support to enable him to set up the website which as he explained would allow members of the public to give feedback about police interactions, where they could record the officers identifiers (name, badge number and station the officer is attached to). This is almost certainly a breach of the law. First it would make Ray a data handler, he would have to register with the ICO (information Commissioner's Office) a step he may take, but if not it would be unlawful. Secondly, and far more importantly it would be a breach of the Terrorism Act. Having a public database of serving police officers identifiers would put those officers at risk. Even if Ray does not intend for it to be used in this way, bad actors could use the site for hostile reconnaissance and worse. Having taken a brief look at the site myself it seems to be a scam. There is a front page, with a form to submit to receive a questionnaire and a donation link. Ray is clearly displaying problematic behaviour. Despite every post, threat, live stream and the stalking he has failed to save the auditors from ACOB. Instead, all he has done is exposed himself as being deeply misogynistic and racist, and has proven his close affiliation with others who have displayed similar and worse behaviours. He has exposed the fact he may be operating a financial scam. I hope he kept his receipts.

## AY Audits

AY was exposed by his own community when they found a news article from several years ago showing he had been subject to a man-hunt in relation to threats to kill two women. He then went on the Society X show and claimed that this was related to a “commercial burglary of a supermarket”, he had a whole story about how he had entered and exited through a loose panel on the roof, stealing a safe. Channel 4 News then did an exposé where it was proven he had close links to a far-right organisation, Vanguard. Feeling the pressure of his past he then confessed on another channel, that he had in fact threatened to burn down his child's school with teachers inside because they were teaching the children things he did not agree with, and made vague indications pointing towards same sex relationships and trans rights. This was calculated, to an audience who believe they are “protecting women and children”, very few excuses would have been accepted for the threats. Unless, that alibi fed into their own bigotry. He framed the threat of arson in a school, as a mission to protect children from what the audience perceived as “dangerous trans ideologies”. The news media spotlight was on the auditing community with outlets like ITV, The Canary, Hope not Hate, and others running articles. ACOB covered it all, documenting every disgusting detail. AY then tried to distract everyone by outing DP, first for his close affiliations with DJE Media (Curtis Arnold) who is a convicted sex offender, and then for having previous contact with the police for a domestic incident. This quickly escalated, AY drove from Epping to Coventry in the middle of the night to fight DP. They both brought accomplices, AY brought weapons, they both recorded and live streamed the fight. After the first clash, DP and his accomplices tried to flee, but AY and his accomplices chased him down. During the second clash it was very clear DP was the victim and heart wrenching to watch, as the much smaller opponent, and while screaming he was sorry, DP was beaten up by AY. At the time of reviewing the footage for the first time, I made it abundantly clear to everyone watching with us, that the words being used against DP were the same words spoken to abuse victims frequently, “ooh you’re sorry are you? I will show you sorry!”. ACOB also covered the fight (but absolutely NOT as it was happening). They took footage from as many sources as possible and created a super cut video showing exactly what had happened. In the immediate aftermath, AY had begun to gaslight his audience, claiming he “went on his own” and that he had gone for a completely different purpose, and not to fight. Despite seeing the fight live, people were happy to believe that. This was technically a DARVO performed on DP. ACOB's video proved AY was lying. ACOB criticised both men and their accomplices. After which DP actually thanked ACOB, agreeing that their coverage had been “fair”.

## List of Shame

1. DJE Media (aka Curtis Arnold/Daniel James Edwards), 243k subscribers. Convicted 2019 at Harrow Crown Court for 12 serious offences. Fraud, voyeurism, causing sexual activity, and making indecent images of a child. Subject of a 10 year SHPO.

2. AJ Audits (Anthony Styles) — Convicted child sex offender, guilty of indecent assault on girls under 14. Registered on the Sex Offenders Register for life.

3. Auditing Lancashire (Kevin Brown) — A Blackburn dad was jailed for the violent abuse of his five-month-old son, who suffered broken legs and a fractured rib

4. PJ Audits (Peter Allsop, Worksop) — Former driving instructor jailed in August 2023 for stalking and harassing a vulnerable 17-year-old former pupil who previously lived with him while in care. Possible further convictions remain unconfirmed.

5. Christopher Gallone (Live Free Official) — Convicted for strangling a partner in a serious domestic violence case reported in Leeds.

6. Gypsy Auditor Danny Ayres — Convicted of a violent assault related to drug and alcohol abuse, as reported in Maidenhead news.

7. SpeakFreeUK (Christopher Dempster) — Caught admitting possession of indecent child images (Category B & C), alongside extreme pornography and a disguised stun gun. He sent inappropriate messages to teenage boys aged 15-16 while acting as an adult cadet leader. Training to be a Special Constable with Greater Manchester Police came to a halt when he received a suspended sentence, was placed on the Sex Offenders Register for 5 years, and was handed a Sexual Harm Prevention Order with internet restrictions.

8. Robert Bailey (aka Jack O’Neil / Evil Gremlin) — Convicted in 2016 for child sexual offences and child pornography, sentenced to 7 years. Shockingly, he’s been seen at protests and Pride events under a new alias.

9. Ryan Allsop (aka Ra9Gamer)- attacked his own mother in a violent assault and then sent threats to kill via text message. Allsop was jailed for two years. Recently outed by his own community for animal abuse, when he failed to take his dog, Anakin to the vets for treatment of Sarcoptic Mange (scabies), which is highly contagious and can be transmitted to humans.

## Why this matters

Sexual habituation occurs when we find great pleasure in a new novel experience but over time our reaction to that stimuli is diminished. It causes people to seek out more extreme forms of stimuli for pleasure. And the first stage of sexual habituation is dehumanising language and for that one needs to have low linguistic empathy. All these men have displayed incredibly low levels of linguistic empathy, and these recent exposures prove that, but they also show that they are far up the escalation ladder. And it’s not just the auditing community, misogyny and the far-right go hand in hand, it's the idea of traditional gender roles, mixed with ethnic superiority. Whenever you find groups of far-right individuals congregating together you will find misogyny. It is quite easy to see how a man stuck on one pipeline may get siphoned into the other but it is far harder to understand how women could be sifted into these groups, especially the misogyny group. But the ‘trad-wife’ is something many of these women wish to be, it feels like a simpler life with less unknowns. When we look to history and groups like the WKKK (Women’s Klu Klux Klan) there does also appear to be a misguided notion that the women associated with these organisations would be seen as superior to those who were not. And we also see extremely misogynistic language from misogynistic females; women suggesting women should not be in the work place, shouldn't make reproductive decisions, should no longer have the right to vote. Female misogyny in its worst form was displayed at a far-right demo a few months ago. A victim of a grooming gang attended as a speaker, when organisers and the audience realised she was going against their narrative, because the perpetrators that hurt her were white, she was dragged off stage and a woman could be heard calling her a “slag” to be very clear the term was derogatory, but it also had a strong implication that her experience was false, that she was a willing participant just because they were white. Four letters with massive implications and ramifications, the worst four letter word you can use against the victim of a grooming gang. The modern far-right groups are no different than the far-right from any other generation except the internet now siphons men and women together, on an industrial scale, and in far-right groups you either fit in or you are the problem becoming the target of hate-filled vitriol and violence. When it comes to BBA's discord (where DP is a mod) this is what we are seeing, sexual habituation, from objectification, to sharing pornography and consuming pornography together in groups in order objectify and dehumanise, to DP's threats of rape, the last stage is rape itself. Predators meet in digital spaces because testing if a friend shares similar proclivities in the real world is risky. So they meet in digital spaces, they share legal material, then taboo and/or illegal material, in these private digital spaces they can dehumanise, demonise and devalue victim types with no risk, testing where people's boundaries are. The algorithm brings like-minded people together, even like-minded monsters. I am not saying men like BBA, Rhys, Ray, AY and DP are definitely monsters but they are definitely on the escalation ladder:

- Starting with dehumanising language like (the “savage, cuck and nugget” terms)

- to visual dehumanisation (sharing porn and group porn sessions)

- to digital assault (AI Deepfakes)

- and then to inciting or excusing physical threats (rape threats)

- the last stage is the physical assault itself Are we going to wait till someone is raped, or are we going to speak out about the escalation ladder and try to stop it from happening? This is the normalisation of sexual violence at different stages. These men demand transparency through their “auditing” practices, yet they deploy DARVO to hide their own criminal histories and predatory behaviours. They are not auditing the law; they are trying to be above it. Their patriotism is a mask for their misogyny and their auditing is a mask for their predation. We cannot keep rescuing these men. When their past or current behaviour is exposed as dangerous we have a responsibility to switch off and make them algorithmically irrelevant. Otherwise we allow them to escalate to the next stage of the ladder. Statistics prove that Gender-Based Cyber-Violence is a precursor to real world harm in the form of physical or sexual crimes. It is not just an internet drama. My own timeline here as well as the investigations by Lewis and Mr Burke, Byline Times and Searchlight magazine show us that these are not isolated hotheaded moments. In the UK 1 in 5 women experience stalking, 1 in 3 experience domestic abuse. When auditors with a combined subscriber count of a quarter of a million normalise these behaviours (and we allow that), they green-light the next generation of domestic abusers and provide a blueprint of how to get away with it. We began with a number: Every 10 minutes a woman somewhere in the world gets murdered by her partner. The path to that level of violence is slow, methodical and calculated, it's an erosion of trust and empathy, through derogatory language, sexual objectification, and digital stalking and harassment of those who speak out. BBA, DP and Ray are not simply content creators, they are the cause of an epidemic of violence against women. It took you 30 minutes to read this which means three women have already been murdered by their partners in this time. The question is: whose side will you be on as the clock continues to tick? Citations: 1. Data Matters – Every Woman Matters – Femicide Census 2. Domestic Abuse Statistics UK - NCDV 3. Domestic abuse, the facts - Women’s Aid 4. Receiving threatening or obscene messages from a partner and mental health 5. Linguistic Empathy: Behavioral measures, neurophysiological correlates, and correlation with Psychological Empathy - ScienceDirect 6. Full article: Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender (DARVO): What Is the Influence on Perceived Perpetrator and Victim Credibility? 7. Domestic abuse victim characteristics, England and Wales: year ending March 2025 8. The Criminal Past of the Far-Right Anti-Migrant ‘Auditors’ Going Viral on YouTube – Byline Times 9. Far-right 'auditor' sends rape threats to anti-racist's family | Searchlight